Jainism-Part 2 Max
Just as lightning defeats the color of 'Night', Jainism lays the foundation of everything that is Not 'Right',
Jain 'Texts' is divided into 2 'Sects', The Digambara and The Svetambara and these 2 'Sects' disagree on which are the authoritative 'Texts',
These 2 'Sects' Agree on the Basis of their Fairytale-Grounder. None the less, the same 2 'Sects' Disagree on the details of their so called divine Founder,
Your Founder is Useless,
Your Founder is Senseless,
& Your Founder is filled with Mental illness,
Your Founder removed his clothes and went Public Fully 'Nude' & by his dizzy actions you think of it as a...'Consuetude',
He set forth an example for all Jain Monks to achieve so called 'Liberation', little did he know...his words were filled with the best 'Lallation'...in which he disfigured the process of Moral 'Mentation',
Now, since the ladies are not allowed to be Naked in Public they can't achieve 'Liberation' & that makes them Prisoners to their own Mentally-ill Male 'Nation',
Your Digam 'cookoo' bara holds that women must be Reborn as 'Men' to attain Salvation?....Huh?
Did you just give another Homosapien a Salvation 'Diagnosis'? St Mary Bethlehem! That's the place to get rid of your agonizing 'Psychosis',
We can end it here, as you know Nothing about Moral 'Evolution', this is why 2 Jain monks were arrested for Molesting a beautifully Fine 'Woman'.
Poet: Vynolyn Naidoo
Now, since the ladies are not allowed to be Naked in Public they can't achieve 'Liberation' & that makes them Prisoners to their own Mentally-ill Male 'Nation',
Your Digam 'cookoo' bara holds that women must be Reborn as 'Men' to attain Salvation?....Huh?
Did you just give another Homosapien a Salvation 'Diagnosis'? St Mary Bethlehem! That's the place to get rid of your agonizing 'Psychosis',
We can end it here, as you know Nothing about Moral 'Evolution', this is why 2 Jain monks were arrested for Molesting a beautifully Fine 'Woman'.
Poet: Vynolyn Naidoo
⚠️Disclaimer: this content is archived for reference only. It was originally created as argumentative material (‘ammo’) for comparative religion debates. With further development in psychology and MHPSS practice, this work is now recognized as ethically inappropriate and not aligned with current professional standards. It must not be used, applied, or replicated.