Confucianism-Part 2 Max

Confucianism with Rheumatics?

Are you good with Mathematics?

Surely, you can get the answers to all of these Dogmatics,

Confucianism has 'No' Authentic Originating date, as it is stated it had developed between 551 and 479 BCE...So, What do you See?

This means it is founded in the 5th and 6th Century BCE, 2 different Centuries?Confused-Creators! So, We See...

Confucius Kǒngzǐ was born in 551 BCE and died in 479 BCE, Wait for it! You will See....

Confucian scholars gives us 2 Books, the Sishu and Wujing as authoritative in Confucianism written before 300 BCE, which is the 3rd Century BCE. Now, What do you See?

Books compiled in the 3rd century BCE, this means Confucianism was founded 100-500 years after the 2 books were written, Can you See?

If the founders' D.O.B and Date of death synchronizes with the Founding dates, then who wrote the 2 books in the 3rd Century BCE? No logic we can See...

Confucian scholars determines the final form of the Analects was compiled during the Mid-han dynasty which is 206BCE to 220 CE, again..What can you See? 

2nd century BCE to 2nd Century CE? +400 years of Interpolation and Fabrication is all we can See, 

You have the Wujing, the 5 Classics, What happened to the 6th? Your mind was Flipped and Tossed and this is why it is claimed to be Lost,

There is no need to get involved with the Content and its' Rates, You already started by giving us the Incorrect Dates,

There is No sensible Teaching, Only rubbish that you have been Unleashing, There is No Astrology Creeping, Just your Mental health that has been Depleting,

Make a change for the Good,

Turn your life to a Positive LiveliHood,

Nothing was Critical and the Wise should have Understood.


Poet: Vynolyn Naidoo

⚠️Disclaimer: this content is archived for reference only. It was originally created as argumentative material (‘ammo’) for comparative religion debates. With further development in psychology and MHPSS practice, this work is now recognized as ethically inappropriate and not aligned with current professional standards. It must not be used, applied, or replicated.

Popular posts from this blog

Holy in disguise (criticism applied)

Avengers

High five! (Psych)