Science and 'religion'.
Let us begin...
Firstly, let us proclamate the difference between science and 'religions', it should be a 1 way streak and there should have not been any 'divisions',
Science explains the world though observation and 'empirical evidence' and religions are based on faith, personal belief and the supernatural, immediately this becomes a really big 'difference'!
Religions explore creative ideas as to 'why' things work and science seeks to understand 'how' things work,
Science uses experimentation and logical 'reasoning', Religions rely on scripture and personal experience which makes the charts sour to its 'seasoning',
Science is undeniably 'provable' where as religions through emperical means are not truly 'verifiable',
Science had led to significant successful advancements in medicine and 'technology', whereas religion has played the role using reverse 'psychology',
The scientific method is proven by its 'success', whereas the religious movements have made a global divisional 'mess',
Each religion is an atheist to the 'other', confusion it is! Therefore, logical reasoning doesn't 'bother',
Humans discovered a strategy for restraining selfishness and building co-operative 'groups', the secret got out...'Whoops!',
Religions use a book, personal experience and 'feelings'? A prospect against fact, logic and its 'dealings',
The facts state true mindful 'benevolence',
Religìons have different names and that becomes the true psych 'specialness',
However, the next part deals with why religions have no 'evidence'.
Poet: Vynolyn Naidoo